Friday, December 5, 2025

Don's Tuesday Column (AS PUBLISHED FRIDAY AFTER EDITOR'S CHANGES AND PUBLISHER'S MANDATES--STILL INTEND TO BOW OUT OF WEEKLY DAILY NEWS COLUMNS)

THE WAY I SEE IT by Don Polson Red Bluff Daily News 12/02/2025

        Thanks for much, just not for CA

I truly hope that this Tuesday finds readers’ lives better off for having shared camaraderie and joyful thanks for what blessings we all share, as well as those for your circle of family and friends. In case any harbor doubts or cynicism about our God-blessed nation, step back from the hateful sources of negativity and recognize that much of the world’s population, who value political and economic freedom, set their sights on this beacon of hope. Not that we want them all, but still.

America has welcomed, and should continue to welcome, those who share our values; and reject anyone wanting to take advantage of the generosity of our taxpayers, refuse to assimilate to our culture, or seek to undermine our constitutional system of representative democracy. Winston Churchill perceptively stated, “...democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

***

In pointing out the benefits of Native agricultural methods to the Pilgrim settlers, which helped them feed their families and community, do remember that starvation threatened the Pilgrims more for their attempted communal system of food “distribution” than their farming techniques. The fruits of all labor were put in a “common store” and given to all equally; such laziness and resentment arose among the inhabitants over having their food given to those who hadn’t harvested as much, that they all faced starvation.

It was only then that Governor Bradford mandated assigning plots to each family or person, together with the commandment that whoever would not work, would not eat. That simple self-serving, free market system then produced the abundance that the Pilgrims shared with their Native neighbors. As this lesson has been emphasized (even in this column) for many years, an unfortunately growing segment of (mostly young) Americans have ignorantly succumbed to the theory of “socialism” as the best path to rectify...fill-in-the-blank social or economic problems.

While such misled voices find little acceptance locally, our not-so-fair state stands at the precipice of a slide to failure that is easily predictable based on the clear history of such failed economic systems throughout history.

***

Our local gas prices are nearly $4 per gallon; California’s average is nearer to $5 per gallon, while the national average is under $3 per gallon. When you realize that the national average includes the exorbitant California prices, you have to accept that the national average minus the CA gas prices would be well below $3/gallon. A number of states are very close to $2.50/gallon (even $2/gallon in some locations).

So, if you drive a few hundred miles per week—let alone if you take a multi-hundred mile trip to relatives—you are parting with over $60 per week or per trip (that’s with a 20-mile/gallon fuel efficiency). If you lived in a state with $2.50/gallon gas, you would spend about $35 per week (300 miles at 20 MPG). Red Bluff prices, let alone California prices, set you back hundreds of dollars per month, thousands of dollars per year—up to 60 percent more than those low gas price states.

See “Thanksgiving gas prices fall to lowest levels since pandemic, with nearly 30 states below $3 a gallon” (foxbusiness.com, 11/25).

***

Wonder why California’s/Red Bluff’s gas is so expensive (besides the taxes)? : On energy and the never-ending obsession with a clean environment: “California’s War on Oil Actually Harms the Environment; California bans offshore oil while importing dirtier foreign crude, worsening environmental and energy outcomes at home” (amgreatness.com, 11/26). Yes, California’s estimated 10 billion barrels of oil, both on- and off-shore, are treated like a communicable disease best left buried, rather than the virtual life blood of nearly every aspect of Red Bluff’s and our state’s economic abundance—which is then sustained by oil from the worst polluters on the planet.

While virtually barricading ourselves from off-shore drilling, “clean energy” proponents want “up to 20 gigawatts of floating offshore wind turbines...requiring 2,000 nearly 700-foot-tall wind turbines,” visually polluting the views from entire shorelines. The energy expected from such a massive “wind farm” is a pittance compared to that from the oil reserves that would need a fraction of the area off our coast.

Such is the backwards, upside-down mentality of the “zero carbon” advocates, ignoring the carbon-producing, environmental cost of the wind turbine materials—which will eventually need replacing, anyway. Would you want to leave Red Bluff for a vacation in Santa Barbara, in an accommodation with ocean views, and have to look at hundreds of wind turbines/mills instead of a pristine ocean sunset.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Why the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction Ripped Biden in This Damning Report

Why the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction Ripped Biden in This Damning Report

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

The final report from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction is a brutal one, not least because it details the funds wasted in this quagmire. Initially, yes, al-Qaeda operatives were training there. We had to blow those camps up, get bin Laden, and degrade their capabilities. 

The problem, in hindsight, was that this region of the world, the graveyard of empires, had zero grasp of or history with liberal democratic principles. Our hubris led us to believe that a U.S. military presence, along with those in ISAF, could facilitate the flourishing of democracy. It didn’t help that the 2009 elections were riddled with shameless fraud. It didn’t work in Afghanistan, and we took our eye off the ball here when we invaded Iraq in 2003.  

It's a mess. It’s our longest war, and it ended with our ignominious exit in 2021, along with the Taliban returning to power. So, yeah, there’s a lot to unpack here. It didn’t help that Joe Biden, a longtime skeptic of the Afghan war, was quarterbacking it. 

The report torments the former president for highlighting the Afghan National Army’s capabilities. They did not have 300,000 troops mobilized. It was maybe 40-50,000. The rest were “ghosts.” The Biden team also spent $14.2 billion to resettle some 75,000 unvetted Afghan nationals. It also detailed the amount of military equipment left behind. In keeping with Joe Biden being an absolute moron and laughably wrong on all things related to foreign affairs, it’s fitting that this would happen on his watch. Joe left quite a gift to the Taliban:

You can read the full report here.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/12/04/why-the-special-inspector-general-for-afghanistan-reconstruction-ripped-biden-in-this-damning-report-n2667358?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Rethinking a Muslim Ban

Rethinking a Muslim Ban

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

The political and media elite erupted again this week when President Trump stated that, if reelected, he would absolutely revoke citizenship from naturalized criminals” and take strong measures to protect Americans from violent offenders who entered under our increasingly broken immigration system. He reminded audiences that he has the authority to do so, and that protecting the American people is not only legitimate — it is the first responsibility of the commander in chief. The statement immediately reignited the debate over immigration from radicalized regions and the now-infamous Muslim Ban.”

The truth is that the Muslim Ban” was never a Muslim ban. Critics shouted the phrase loudly and often enough that many Americans never learned what the policy actually did. The original executive order did not prohibit Muslims from entering the United States. It restricted travel and refugee entry from seven countries racked by civil war, controlled by terror networks, or lacking reliable identity-verification systems. Those countries — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — were identified not because they were Muslim, but because they were unstable, violent, or compromised states. In other words, the ban was targeted at the highest-risk points of entry, where terrorism was statistically the most concentrated and where vetting was impossible. Thats not bigotry; thats basic national security.

And given what we know today, it was one of the most responsible foreign-policy decisions made in the last quarter-century.

This weeks headlines provide fresh, horrifying evidence that the threat is not theoretical. After the killing of an innocent National Guard troop and the critical wounding of another by a shooter reportedly here illegally from Afghanistan — a country President Biden handed back to the Taliban in a historic failure — Americans are once again confronted with the consequences of importing instability and hoping for the best. Afghanistan is now once again a global terrorist incubator. To pretend that migrants from such environments present no risk is willful ignorance dressed up as compassion.

At the same time, in Europe, a story emerged so brutal it would be dismissed as implausible if it appeared in a film script. According to multiple reports, including Fox News coverage of Dutch prosecution statements, a Muslim father and his two sons in the Netherlands have been charged with drowning their 18-year-old daughter in a swamp because she adopted what they called a Western lifestyle” and refused to wear a headscarf. It is being investigated as an honor killing — an execution carried out in the name of family purity.” That phrase alone should send chills down the spine of anyone who cares about human dignity.

Honor killings. Forced circumcision of girls in Sudan. Female genital mutilation across large portions of North Africa. Wife-beating legalized or tacitly protected in parts of the Middle East. Public executions for leaving Islam. Children forced into child marriage. Women treated not as human beings but as property whose value” is based on obedience. These are not fringe anomalies. They are cultural norms in large swaths of the Muslim world. They openly defy the American idea that life has inherent worth.

That American principle — the belief that every individual is created in the image of God — the Imago Dei — is the foundation for the concept of human rights. Remove that principle, and freedom collapses into barbarism. A culture that treats women like disposable furniture and kills its daughters for autonomy cannot peacefully integrate into a society that believes human beings possess sacred dignity.

This is not an abstract concern. It is personal. On Sunday, over brunch, I tried to explain these realities to my sons. It was painful, because we personally know Muslims whom we count as friends — moderate, thoughtful, kind people. People who enjoy the liberty that America provides. People who do not practice the extreme devotions of fundamentalist Islamic law. But that leads to a hard and unavoidable truth: what makes them good neighbors is precisely what makes them bad Muslims according to the strictest demands of their own doctrine. The only Muslims who flourish in a free society are those who reject the most rigid and brutal demands of orthodoxy. That is not prejudice — that is observable reality.

It is not racist to ask whether importing large populations from cultures that endorse or tolerate honor killings, female mutilation, and religiously justified violence is wise. It is not hateful to protect daughters from being murdered in the name of purity. It is not bigotry to insist that those entering our nation embrace the belief that women and children have intrinsic value.

And yet, thanks to Barack Obama and Joe Biden, refugee and asylum pipelines from volatile regions expanded dramatically, often over the objections of national security officials. Skeptics were shamed into silence. Even questioning the wisdom of unchecked entry became grounds for accusations of racism. Meanwhile, families buried their children, communities buried their soldiers, and media outlets shrugged.

Now, after preventable deaths, President Trump faces impossible moral math: act boldly and be called cruel, or do nothing and allow the killing to continue. There is only one morally defensible path. Revoking citizenship from naturalized criminals is not extreme. Halting asylum fraud is not extreme. Restoring travel restrictions from radicalized nations is not extreme. Speeding deportations of violent offenders is not extreme. Protecting innocent American lives is not cruelty — it is leadership.

The harshest policy is the one that allows more innocent people to die.

The left insists strong borders are unkind. No — burying a soldier while explaining we refused to act is unkind. Telling parents their daughter died because we chose ideology over safety is unkind. Watching terrorists exploit compassion and slaughter our citizens is unkind.

America must choose. Civilization or chaos. Security or suicide. Courage or appeasement. We cannot survive a world where every value is negotiable and every boundary is erased. We have a duty to protect the civilization our ancestors built with blood and hard-won wisdom.

It is time to rethink what the media mocked as a Muslim Ban.” It was never a ban on a religion. It was a shield for our people. And it may be the only thing that prevents more funerals.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/12/01/rethinking-a-muslim-ban-n2667185?utm_source=thdailyvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

In Eight Words, Trump Destroys the Left's Entire Case Against Him

In Eight Words, Trump Destroys the Left's Entire Case Against Him

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

All right, which one of you clowns signed me up to receive mailings from the far-left Youth Save Democracy PAC? I suppose you think you’re very funny. But anyway, on Saturday, I received a breathless email from them, and it looks as if the sky is falling: “Robert,” it said chummily, “Donald Trump just said the quiet part out loud. In a recent interview, Trump openly mused about serving a third term as president - something explicitly forbidden by the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.”

After that, they threw every typographical denotation of urgency at me, just so I’d know how serious they are: “This isn't a joke. This isn't hyperbole. This is Trump telling us exactly what he wants to do. And there's only one thing standing between Trump and unchecked power: the House of Representatives.”

Following that horror-of-horrors-the-sky-is-falling scenario was a pitch to give them money so that Democrats can take back the House in 2026. Now, if Trump really were the fascist dictator of the left’s fervid imagining, winning back the House wouldn’t help, but this mailing was actually only a mild helping of Trump-is-a-dictator hysteria. Has-been talk show host David Letterman was more direct last Tuesday, but after all, he is a relic of a more direct age. “He’s our dictator,” Letterman declared, adding: “He’s not going anywhere.”

Well, sure, except then you wake up. That is, then you wake up if you’re not a leftist who is so blinded by hatred and so indoctrinated with propaganda that you can’t see what’s right in front of you. As for the third term, Trump said this in late October: “I have my highest poll numbers that I've ever had, and, you know, based on what I read, I guess I'm not allowed to run. So, we'll see what happens. I would say that if you read it, it's pretty clear. I'm not allowed to run. It's too bad, but we have a lot of great people.” 

Apparently, even wanting to remain in office is evidence of a dictatorial tendency, although no one was sounding the alarm about a dictator-in-the-making back in 2015, when Barack Obama said: “I am in my second term. It has been an extraordinary privilege for me to serve as President of the United States. I cannot imagine a greater honor or a more interesting job. I love my work. But under our Constitution, I cannot run again. I can't run again. I actually think I'm a pretty good President — I think if I ran, I could win. But I can't.”

Obama also famously said in late 2020, “I used to say if I can make an arrangement where I had a stand-in or front-man or front-woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of deliver the lines while someone was doing all the talking and ceremony, I’d be fine with that because I found the work fascinating.” Nobody uttered a word of protest, even in the face of hints that Obama rolled out exactly this plan between 2021 and 2025.

Now, in a discussion about sending criminal migrants back where they came from, would-be dictator Trump said: “If we have criminals that came into our country, and they were naturalized maybe through Biden or somebody that didn't know what they were doing, if I have the power to do it... I would denaturalize, absolutely!" 

Related: Far-Left Senator Finds a Brand-New Reason to Be Enraged at Trump

“If I have the power to do it”? To hear leftists tell it, such matters never trouble Trump, who has supposedly run roughshod over all manner of checks and balances in the first year of his second term. In reality, however, with those eight words, spoken in passing, Trump exposed the hollowness of the left’s entire strategy at this point. Trump actually has repeatedly demonstrated punctilious respect for the Constitution and the rule of law, even to the point of obeying the politically motivated rulings of leftist judges who are trying to stop him from implementing his agenda.

The real dictator-in-the-making was Old Joe Biden, or rather, the people who were running the White House in those days. It was they who weaponized the Justice Department against their political enemies, worked with the social media giants to destroy the freedom of speech, and treated those who opposed their policies as if they were terrorists. When the Democrats call Trump a dictator, they are engaging once again in that time-honored tactic of accusing their enemies of what they themselves are guilty of doing. It isn’t the first time, and it won’t be the last.

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2025/12/01/in-eight-words-trump-destroys-the-lefts-entire-case-against-him-n4946607?utm_source=twdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Democrat Leadership is Sinister, Not Misguided

Democrat Leadership is Sinister, Not Misguided

AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin

Even the least informed among Republicans should have gained valuable insights from the Schumer Shutdown. Impeding so many functions of government for 40+ days served a purpose for Democrats. It didn't matter how many Americans were suffering or what kinds of delays and hardships citizens were encountering. That some people wouldn't be able to pay their bills or eat full meals was of little concern.

Holding Out on Cue

Those crafty Democrats, ever plotting and planning for ways to take political control and to wield absolute power, had sought all along to hold out until the November 4, 2025, elections.

With the rock-solid support of the fakestream propaganda machine, they knew they’d be able to usher in a distinct, if limited, number of new governors, attorneys general, mayors, and other elected officials across the country. Obviously, the few elections were small in number compared to the forthcoming midterms and to the 2028 national election.

It behooves everyone on the Right, nonetheless, to understand that Democrat leadership is not weak-willed or moronic. They are unrelenting in their fervor. In each and every instance where they can muster any leverage, no matter how many of their own constituents it hurts, they seek to take political power. They aim to dominate in election after election, and ultimately, to bring down the country. Legions of them are a part of the movement.

Part of Plan

As we've witnessed, they grow more brazen with the passage of time. Their quest to destroy America was once a closely guarded secret. Now, the quiet part is often said out loud. Behaviors that seem shocking to the Right are merely aspects of the Left’s overall plan.

For too long, the Right has pretended or been fooled into thinking that the outliers among Democratic leaders did not represent the base. We believed that people who spoke and acted in a radical manner, which would have made Democrats of yesteryear shudder, were somehow anomalies. They are not.

When you hear AOC and her childish blather, Jasmine Crockett and her constant idiotic harangue, Hakeem Jeffries and his idle threats, and now Zohran Mamdani and Katie Wilson, it's vital to understand that these zealots are on a mission and will not be dissuaded from it.

That Was Then, This is Now

A few decades ago, one could argue that Republicans and Democrats had reasonably similar goals for the strength and vitality of our nation, but differed in approaches. Today, that is simply not the case. Many, if not most, on the Left, including many moderates, unknowingly brainwashed from birth, have concluded that American culture is not worthy of being maintained. They believe that we are inherently evil, the U.S. Constitution must be scrapped, and everything must be restarted from scratch under Democrat rule, ultimately yielding to one-world rule

Their preferences for implementing no-cash baildefunding the police, squeezing the middle class, weakening the military, over-printing money, and so much more all have one essential objective: to weaken us on every dimension.

The full measure of the Left’s sinister intent is not widely comprehended by the American populace and, of course, is never accurately portrayed by the fakestream media. Then, once arriving at a certain level of equilibrium, they will charge forward. As a prime example, with Mamdani being elected in New York, the next day, his tenor changes, his statements become bolder, and his true intent emerges.

In the Oval Office, he makes nice with President Trump for one day, all for show. Soon enough, voters will come to realize they were duped by him. All around us, the same scenario plays out repeatedly, primarily on the East and Left (West) coast.

Powerful Propaganda

As disastrous as their programs, policies, and results prove to be, because the fakestream media is totally committed to Leftist causes, every story is spun accordingly. Whether it is inflation, immigration, blue city crime, etc., Democrat viewpoints will be bankrolled and propped up for years, even as the fakestream media dies a slow death.

Despite the acceleration of alternative news sources that strive for some measure of objectivity, the fakestream media could hang on well past Donald Trump's second term. Even with Republican presidents for 12 years, Democrats still will be in a prime position to spread their poison. The hoaxes will not dissipate. The bogus stories will continue on. Voter fraud and election tampering might still not be resolved despite President Trump’s sterling efforts.

Leftists have successfully hoodwinked tens of millions of voters, voters who have been thoroughly programmed to pledge their allegiance to false authorities. Their numbers and efficacy cannot be denied. The danger that the Founding Fathers feared most – the enemy from within – is here.

A Decades-Long Battle

We will attain victories sporadically. Like "whack-a-mole," as soon as we deal with one Leftist promulgated hoax or crisis, another and another and another will arise. We are facing a decades-long battle. Like Moses, we will not be around to experience the promise land.

https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffdavidson/2025/11/30/democrat-leadership-is-sinister-not-misguided-n2667141?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

They Broke America and Blame Trump: A Country Waking Up From an Abusive Relationship

They Broke America and Blame Trump: A Country Waking Up From an Abusive Relationship

APPhoto/Andres Kudacki, File

Two National Guardsmen were ambushed on American streets, one dying in the hospital and one still fighting for his life, when an Afghan national opened fire near the White House. Before investigators even finished marking shell casings, Democratic officials rushed to do what they always do.

They blamed Donald Trump.

Not the catastrophic, chaotic Afghanistan evacuation their administration orchestrated, the one in which “fill the planes” mattered more than vetting. Nor the bureaucrats and intelligence officials who rubber-stamped this man’s entry and then approved his permanent residency without catching glaring red flags. And not the political pressure that turned a sober security process into a speed-run.

No. The blame immediately flowed toward Trump, and by extension toward the tens of millions of Americans who voted for him. And because they still pretty much own the mainstream media, that's the direction most public coverage flowed. Not "why did this happen," but "we know who did this!"

It was obscene.

But it was also both tiresome and familiar.

This is the reflex now: create a disaster, deny responsibility, then shove the wreckage at Trump’s feet. This pattern has become so routine that half the country can recite it in their sleep, and the other half are terrified of a bogeyman invented by the left.

The Economic Fire They Lit With Stacks of Cash

Disaster number two: under Biden, the economy didn’t gradually sag. It exploded. Trillions were printed and borrowed with the restraint of a teenager with a new unlimited credit card. Money was hurled into green-energy fantasies that went insolvent almost instantly. More money was shoveled into Ukraine than any auditing mechanism could keep up with. COVID-era payments continued long after COVID-era reality ended.

Inflation soared. Groceries doubled. Housing prices became unrecognizable. Energy bills crushed families.

And now that inflation has come down under Trump — slowly, yes, but unmistakably — Democrats have the audacity to blame him for not reversing the damage faster.

You don’t get to burn the house down and then yell at the firefighters for leaving soot on the walls.

The Shutdown They Engineered

The same sleight-of-hand marked the longest government shutdown in American history. Democrats framed it as a battle against Trump’s supposed extremism. The truth is uglier.

Republicans voted repeatedly to keep the government open under the exact same conditions Democrats passed under Biden. No new demands. No cuts. No changes. Just “keep it running and negotiate the next budget like adults.”

Democrats refused.

Why? Because they wanted to jam through trillions in new spending, mostly to patch holes in Obamacare and preserve inflated COVID-era subsidies that masked its real cost. They leveraged fear — of missed paychecks, closed airports, suspended programs — to force through a massive, unpopular spending blitz.

The shutdown was a hostage situation. Then they blamed Trump for the broken glass.

The Children They Sacrificed

The same pattern played out in the cultural arena. Democrats pushed the idea that young children, kids who still have their baby teeth, should declare their “true gender” and begin medical interventions.

Puberty blockers. Cross-sex hormones. Surgeries. None of them tested long-term on adults, let alone children. All of them already showing devastating consequences in every country that tried it.

Parents said, “Stop. Think. This is our child.”

Democrats said, “Bigot. Trump voter. Fascist. Dead daughter or live son?”

They used children as ideological test subjects. They demanded parents surrender instinct and common sense. And when Americans balked at sterilizing minors in the name of political fashion, Democrats tried to pin the backlash on Trump.

The ignorance and cruelty is difficult to overstate.

The Illiteracy They Created

Meanwhile, unions pushed whole-word reading, an idea that had already been discredited decades ago, because it made publishers rich and consultants richer. Literacy collapsed. Children suffered. Teachers were blamed.

Then states broke free. Mississippi, a state that had historically been at the very bottom of all educational outcomes, returned to phonics. Reading scores shot upward. A Mississippi miracle!

And Democrats blamed Republicans for “attacking public education.”

No. Republicans in Mississippi attacked the failed ideology that created an army of struggling readers. And the results spoke for themselves.

Success was the indictment.

The Elections They Tinker With

Democrats insist “democracy” is under threat, yet quietly tolerate and sometimes encourage the gray-zone behaviors that erode public trust: nonprofits doing political work under charitable umbrellas, ballot harvesting in institutions where residents barely understand what’s being signed, rumor mills functioning as newsrooms, tech companies influenced by Democrat politicians and bureaucrats throttling disfavored stories at politically convenient moments.

When the Justice Department simply asks questions about these practices — not arrests, not raids, just questions — Democrats wail about tyranny.

Investigations into corruption are labeled authoritarianism. Transparency becomes “persecution.” Accountability becomes “fascism.”

Their response reveals everything.

The Media They Weaponized

The press once claimed to be adversarial to power. Today it’s adversarial only to Trump.

Every breath he takes is framed as a threat. Every moment of restraint is framed as strategy. Every moment of candor is framed as chaos. If he smiles, it’s sinister. If he frowns, it’s dangerous.

They even denied Melania, a professional model, multilingual, impeccably elegant, the covers of fashion magazines for four years. Petty, spiteful, and transparent. And now that she speaks more publicly, showing intelligence and conviction, they pretend not to see her.

This professional model is the ONLY First Lady since before Jackie Kennedy to not grace the covers of Vogue. The only one to not get multiple fashion magazine covers and spreads. And she's literally a dream project for photography.

Melania wins in the end; their decision to ignore her physical beauty and grace allowed her natural intelligence to shine, and Americans who follow her found even more to respect in this unique and talented lady. The media loses. Again.

Their obsession is no longer ideological. It’s pathological.

The Opposition That Has Become Noise

At this point, everything they say collapses into the same dead note:

“Orange man bad.”

That’s it. That’s the whole argument. That’s the entire worldview.

Never mind that their own officials created the mess Trump is trying to clean up. Never mind that their policies warped healthcare, undermined education, destabilized the economy, and weakened national security. Never mind that they refuse to consider that any idea outside their echo chamber might work better.

Democrats have become the political version of a bad husband who never listens: the man who brings home gifts the wife never wanted, insists she should be grateful, and calls her unreasonable when she isn’t.

America is that wife: Ignored. Dismissed. Gaslit. Talked over.

Ordered to smile.

Trump, for all his blunt force and bombast, listened. He built the 80/20 rule — focus on what the overwhelming majority of Americans actually want — because he understood something the elites forgot:

America knows what America needs.

Not the think tanks, the donors, the media, the bureaucrats, and especially not the political class that brings home glittering nonsense while bills pile up on the table.

And now it’s time for the other half of the country to recognize what they’ve been enduring: an abusive relationship with a political class that doesn’t love them, doesn’t hear them, and doesn’t respect them.

Once you see the abuse, you stop excusing it. You stop rationalizing it. You stop going back.

And that — more than anything — is what terrifies them.

https://pjmedia.com/jamie-wilson/2025/11/30/they-broke-america-and-blame-trump-a-country-waking-up-from-an-abusive-relationship-n4946560?utm_source=thdailypmvip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

Democrats’ Calls For Violence Are Succeeding

Democrats’ Calls For Violence Are Succeeding

by John Hinderaker in CrimeDemocratsLiberals

As I have written before, I don’t know whether Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who shot two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., killing at least one, is 1) a raving lunatic, 2) a devout Muslim–witnesses said that he shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he murdered Americans–or 3) a sucker who fell for Democratic Party talking points. The fact that it is hard to distinguish among these alternatives is revealing. In all likelihood, at least two of the foregoing categories apply.

More broadly, we can see that the Democrats’ war on law enforcement is succeeding. It has been focused mostly against America’s immigration laws, which Democrats hate but don’t have the votes to repeal. Democrats have viciously attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, denouncing its agents as a modern-day “Gestapo,” and trying at every turn to interfere with their work. Most recently, Oregon Governor Tina Kotak has threatened to criminally prosecute ICE employees for doing their jobs. As a legal matter, that threat is absurd. But the real threat lies underneath–the threat that people who are deranged and/or unusually loyal to the Democratic Party will be emboldened to try to kill ICE agents.

That threat is deadly serious:

Assaults on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have skyrocketed 1,150% so far this year compared to the last year of the Biden administration — with nearly 250 attacks recorded since President Trump took office.

The disturbing surge comes amid a climate of heightened danger for immigration authorities, including stalking, death threats, online doxxing and outright assaults, which the Department of Homeland Security says is being encouraged by lefty politicians opposed to Trump’s illegal immigration crackdown.

That is quite a record–a 1,150% increase. Congratulations, Democrats! The same applies to National Guardsmen who have been deployed to bring peace to violent cities, and who have been uniformly denounced by Democratic politicians. We saw the result in the murder of Sarah Beckstrom and the grievous wounding of Andrew Wolfe. When one of America’s two leading parties issues a call for violence (“resistance” to the “Gestapo”), the results are predictable, and surely were both foreseen and intended by leaders of the Democratic Party.

This is where we find ourselves in 2025 America: insurrection has been normalized–we haven’t even gotten to the Seditious Six!–with fatal consequences.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/democrats-calls-for-violence-are-succeeding.php